Cadaver Study Novice Cricothyrotomy via Scalpel-Finger-Hook-Shiley vs. Melker vs. QuickTrach

Perioperative Medicine  |   August 2016

Emergency Cricothyrotomy Performed by Surgical Airway–naive Medical Personnel: A Randomized Crossover Study in Cadavers Comparing Three Commonly Used Techniques

Success rates (P = 0.025)

Surgical cricothyrotomy 95%,
QuickTrach 55%
Melker 50%
The majority of failures were due to cannula misplacement (15 of 20).
Few significant complications were found in successful procedures. No cadaver biometric parameters were correlated with success of the procedure.

Mean procedure time in successes (P < 0.001)

Surgical cricothyrotomy 94 ± 35 s
QuickTrach II 77 ± 34 s
Melker 149 ± 24 s .

http://anesthesiology.pubs.asahq.org/article.aspx?articleid=2528137

Heymans et al, Emerg Cric Naive Cadavers Three Techniques, Periop Med 2016

via and thanks to Mohammed Asiri

Advertisements

One thought on “Cadaver Study Novice Cricothyrotomy via Scalpel-Finger-Hook-Shiley vs. Melker vs. QuickTrach

  1. Pingback: Emergency Cricothyrotomy Performed by Surgical Airway–naive Medical Personnel | Prehospital and Retrieval Medicine - THE PHARM dedicated to the memory of Dr John Hinds

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s